Parallel ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: To get from point A to point C, you have to stop at point B. To get to point B, you have to stop at point D. Therefore, to get to point C, you must stop at point D.

Conclusion: Any traveler flying from Beijing to Lhasa is forced to fly to Xian.

Reasoning: Reaching Lhasa from Beijing requires a stop in Chengdu, and reaching Chengdu from Beijing requires a stop in Xian.

Analysis: This argument follows a valid transitive structure: A requires B, and B requires C, therefore A requires C. It is a classic conditional chain where the necessary condition of one relationship becomes the sufficient condition for the next. To find the parallel, look for an answer that sets up a similar 'must-have' chain. The subject matter doesn't matter; focus strictly on the logic that if the first thing happens, the second must happen, and if the second happens, the third must happen.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

23.

The pattern of reasoning exhibited by the argument above is most similar to that exhibited by which one of the following?

Correct Answer
B
B matches the transitive necessity pattern: Yellow requires Green; Green requires White; therefore anyone at Yellow must have reached White. This mirrors the original Beijing → Lhasa requires Chengdu; and Chengdu (from Beijing) requires Xian; hence Beijing → Lhasa implies Xian.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep