Passage Summary: The author argues that because television produced music videos, anyone who considers music videos to be art must concede that television has produced an art form.

Conclusion: If you believe music videos are a form of art, you must also believe that television created a form of art.

Reasoning: Television is the medium that gave rise to music videos.

Analysis: This is a Parallel Reasoning question where we need to match the underlying logical structure. The argument follows a simple conditional path: if a product (music videos) belongs to a category (art), then the source of that product (television) must be credited with producing something in that category. It is essentially saying 'If X is Y, and Z produced X, then Z produced Y.' When looking for the match, focus on this relationship between a specific item, its classification, and its origin. Avoid being distracted by the subject matter of art or media; look for that specific 'source-to-product' link.