Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A candidate is stuck in a situation where both available options lead to the exact same failure.

Conclusion: Thompson is certain to lose the upcoming election.

Reasoning: If Thompson appeals to moderates, he loses his base; if he doesn't, he loses the moderates to his opponent. Both paths lead to insufficient votes for a win.

Analysis: This structure is known as a constructive dilemma: 'If A then C, and if Not A then C; therefore, C.' It presents two exhaustive possibilities and shows that the outcome is the same regardless of which one occurs. To find the parallel, look for an argument that sets up a binary choice (X or Y) where both X and Y lead to the same inevitable result. The content doesn't matter, but the 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' logic must be identical.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

10.

Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its reasoning to the argument above?

Correct Answer
B
B matches the dilemma form: relocate -> lose employees; stay -> lose employees; so the company will lose employees no matter what. That mirrors the original’s “appeal or not, lose” structure.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep