Parallel ReasoningDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A radio producer says they have two choices, and since one choice will destroy the business, they must pick the other one.

Conclusion: The radio station should start playing more popular music genres.

Reasoning: The station must choose between adding popular music or staying strictly classical; staying strictly classical leads to bankruptcy, which is an unacceptable outcome.

Analysis: The reasoning follows a 'disjunctive syllogism' structure combined with a value judgment. The producer establishes a forced choice between two mutually exclusive paths (A or B). They then show that path B leads to a disastrous result (going out of business), which we are told must be avoided. Therefore, path A must be taken. When looking for a parallel, find an argument that presents two options, eliminates one because of a negative consequence, and concludes the other must be chosen.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

22.

Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to that used by the radio producer?

Correct Answer
B
It matches the structure: two options (make curtains or buy blinds), one option (buy blinds) entails an unacceptable consequence (special order and no time to wait), normatively avoid that consequence, so choose the other option (make curtains).
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep