Principle JustifyDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A rule says auction houses lie if they try to trick people with 'opinions.' The author says Healy's lied by calling a new vase an old one.

Conclusion: Healy's is guilty of misrepresentation regarding the description of the vase in its catalog.

Reasoning: The catalog described a modern reproduction as a mid-eighteenth-century vase, despite the house's general disclaimer that descriptions are opinions.

Analysis: The principle provided requires a 'deliberate attempt to mislead' for a house to be guilty of misrepresentation. However, the application only tells us that the description was factually incorrect—it doesn't explicitly state that Healy's knew it was a reproduction or intended to deceive anyone. To justify this application, we need an answer that provides that missing link of intent. Look for a choice that confirms Healy's acted with the specific goal of tricking the bidders, as that is the only way to trigger the 'guilty' verdict under this specific rule.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

18.

Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the above application of the principle?

Correct Answer
E
E shows Healy’s described the vase as mid-eighteenth century merely to increase its auction price, which is a deliberate attempt to mislead bidders. That directly triggers the principle’s condition for misrepresentation despite the “opinion” label.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep