Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Scientists used to think we mixed with Neanderthals, but because our DNA looks very different from a Neanderthal's DNA, the author says it never happened.

Conclusion: Prehistoric ancestors of modern humans did not interbreed with Neanderthals.

Reasoning: DNA from a Neanderthal specimen is significantly different from the DNA of people living today.

Analysis: The anthropologist is making a huge leap from 'modern DNA is different' to 'interbreeding never happened.' This argument relies on the assumption that if interbreeding had occurred, we would still see Neanderthal DNA in humans today. It also assumes that the DNA from the specific remains tested is representative of Neanderthals as a whole. If Neanderthal genetic markers could have disappeared over thousands of generations, the author's evidence wouldn't actually prove their conclusion. The necessary assumption will likely bridge the gap between ancient mating and modern genetic evidence.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

19.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the anthropologist's argument?

Correct Answer
C
C states that the DNA of prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors was not significantly more similar to Neanderthals than modern human DNA is. Negation test: if it were significantly more similar, then the present difference would not rule out interbreeding, collapsing the argument. So C is required.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep