Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Britain uses a quarantine to keep rabies out, but the author argues this won't work forever because you can't exactly put a wild bat in a cage at the border, and they fly in from Europe all the time.

Conclusion: The current quarantine policy in Britain will eventually fail to prevent rabies outbreaks.

Reasoning: While domesticated animals are quarantined, wild bats—which are highly susceptible to rabies—fly into the country from Europe and cannot be subjected to the same controls.

Analysis: The argument employs a strategy of identifying a specific exception that renders a general policy insufficient. It acknowledges the existence of a rule (quarantine for imported animals) but points to a vector (wild bats) that the rule cannot possibly cover. By highlighting this uncontrollable variable, the author concludes that the policy's ultimate goal is unattainable. To identify this strategy, look for how the author uses the 'wild bat' premise to undermine the long-term efficacy of the quarantine.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

13.

Which one of the following is an argumentative strategy employed in the argument?

Correct Answer
E
E is correct because the argument’s core strategy is: the policy targets only imported domesticated animals, but rabid bats can arrive and cannot be quarantined; therefore the policy is bound to fail since a likely defeating event lies outside the policy’s influence.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep