Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Writers either know they're right or know they're wrong, so they never actually have a reason to open a grammar book.

Conclusion: Grammar books are of no use to authors as reference tools.

Reasoning: Authors won't write sentences they know are wrong, and they won't check books for sentences they are sure are right.

Analysis: The novelist's argument suffers from a false dilemma, assuming that writers are always in a state of total certainty or total awareness of their errors. It ignores the vast middle ground of writers who are simply 'unsure' and use a grammar book to resolve that uncertainty. Look for an answer that points out the failure to consider the writer who isn't sure if a sentence is grammatical and seeks a reference to find out. The novelist seems to think writers have the ego of a god and the self-correction of a computer, leaving no room for the humble 'maybe' that keeps the reference book industry alive.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

The reasoning in the novelist's argument is flawed because the argument

Correct Answer
E
E states the core flaw: it ignores the possibility between certainty of grammaticality and thinking a sentence is ungrammatical—i.e., being unsure—where a grammar book could be useful.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep