Must be TrueDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Modern experts think an old-fashioned punishment makes kids grow up to be insecure, but the actual evidence shows those kids grew up to be just as confident as everyone else.

Reasoning: Psychologists believe a specific 19th-century punishment damages self-esteem and adult confidence, but data shows adults who experienced it are just as confident as those who did not.

Analysis: We are looking for a deduction based on the conflict between a psychological theory and historical evidence. If the theory predicts a specific outcome (lower confidence) that failed to materialize in the real world, then the theory's application to this specific practice is likely incorrect. Look for an answer that suggests the psychologists' claims about the long-term effects of this particular punishment are not supported by the evidence. It turns out that sitting outside might have been boring, but it didn't necessarily ruin anyone's life.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

11.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the historian's statements?

Correct Answer
E
E captures the conditional inference: given that loss of self-esteem would lower adult confidence, the equal average confidence implies the practice did not tend to cause significant loss of self-esteem.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep