Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A company is looking for a new president and has several great options, but the author argues that Jones is the best pick simply because her specific background and skills are unlike anyone else's.

Conclusion: Jones is the most qualified candidate to be the new president of United Wire.

Reasoning: While there are several excellent candidates with different talents, none of them possess the exact same unique set of qualifications that Jones has.

Analysis: The author falls into a classic trap by confusing 'uniqueness' with 'superiority.' While it is true that no one else has Jones's specific resume, the stimulus admits that every candidate brings different talents to the table, which implies they are likely all unique in their own way. Just because your collection of vintage stamps is unique doesn't mean it's more valuable than someone else's unique collection of rare coins. Look for an answer choice that identifies this failure to explain why Jones's specific set of traits is actually better for the job than the different traits offered by her competitors.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

6.

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the ground that it

Correct Answer
C
C correctly identifies the flaw: the argument tries to single out Jones based on having a unique set of qualifications, even though the setup implies all candidates likely have unique sets.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep