Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: If something is bad for people and anyone can buy it, the government should slap a massive tax on it so people stop using it.

Reasoning: The principle establishes that if a substance is harmful and available to the public, it should be taxed at a rate high enough to deter its use.

Analysis: This is a straightforward conditional rule: if a substance meets the criteria of being 'harmful' and 'publicly available,' then a specific action—taxing to discourage use—is required. When looking for an application, ensure the substance in the answer choice is explicitly described as harmful and accessible to the general public. If the tax mentioned doesn't actually aim to reduce consumption, or if the substance isn't harmful, it won't fit the politician's criteria. It's a 'sin tax' logic applied strictly to public health and safety.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

1.

Which one of the following is an application of the politician's principle of taxation?

Correct Answer
C
C applies the principle: the pesticide contains a human-harmful compound (harmful and publicly available), and the tax is raised to give people an incentive to choose non-harmful alternatives—i.e., to discourage continued use.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep