Passage Summary: A fair government shouldn't stop you from doing what you want unless you're actually hurting someone else or their stuff.

Reasoning: A government is only considered just if it limits citizen actions exclusively when those actions pose a direct threat to the health or property of others.

Analysis: This principle provides a necessary condition for a government's restriction of rights to be 'just.' If a restriction exists, it must be tied to a threat to health or property; if no such threat exists, the restriction is unjust. When evaluating the judgments in the options, look for a scenario that either validates a restriction because a threat is present or, more likely, invalidates a restriction because the behavior in question is harmless to others. It’s the classic 'your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins' philosophy.