Flawed ReasoningDiff: Hardest
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: Since the success rates for short and long treatments are the same for both regular doctors and specialists, it does not matter which one you pick.
Conclusion: Whether you see a specialist or a general practitioner for physical therapy makes no difference in your recovery chances.
Reasoning: Statistical records show that the percentage of patients showing major improvement was roughly the same for both types of doctors across different treatment durations.
Analysis: This argument falls into a common trap by assuming the two groups being compared are identical in every other way. If specialists are primarily seeing patients with much more severe injuries, then a 50% success rate for them is actually much more impressive than a 50% success rate for a general practitioner seeing minor cases. You should look for an answer that points out this failure to account for the initial severity of the patients' conditions. It is a classic case of comparing apples to oranges while pretending they are all just fruit.
Conclusion: Whether you see a specialist or a general practitioner for physical therapy makes no difference in your recovery chances.
Reasoning: Statistical records show that the percentage of patients showing major improvement was roughly the same for both types of doctors across different treatment durations.
Analysis: This argument falls into a common trap by assuming the two groups being compared are identical in every other way. If specialists are primarily seeing patients with much more severe injuries, then a 50% success rate for them is actually much more impressive than a 50% success rate for a general practitioner seeing minor cases. You should look for an answer that points out this failure to account for the initial severity of the patients' conditions. It is a classic case of comparing apples to oranges while pretending they are all just fruit.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage18.The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
Correct Answer
E
E identifies the core oversight: specialists and general practitioners might each be better for different types of injuries. Equal aggregate rates within duration groups do not show equivalence for every injury; for a given injury, the choice could change the chance of major improvement.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal