Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: It is too expensive to send building supplies to Mars, so we probably will not be living there anytime soon.

Conclusion: Establishing a human colony on Mars will not be financially practical.

Reasoning: Building a colony requires massive amounts of materials, and the cost of shipping those materials from Earth through space is prohibitively high.

Analysis: The author is assuming that the only way to get materials to Mars is by shipping them from Earth at a high cost. This creates a significant logical gap: what if we do not have to ship them? To make the conclusion follow, the argument must assume that there is no other viable way to obtain these materials. Look for an answer that rules out the possibility of sourcing or manufacturing these basic materials directly on Mars.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

17.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

Correct Answer
E
E ties the cost premise to the feasibility conclusion by ruling out a local workaround: if Mars is not a practical source of the required materials, then the colony must rely on expensive transport, supporting the claim of non-feasibility. Negation test: If Mars is a practical source, then costly transport can be avoided; colonization could be economically feasible—destroying the argument.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep