Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: People use words like 'site' for the internet, which sounds like real estate, so the author thinks we should use real estate laws to police the web.

Conclusion: It is reasonable to apply the common law of trespass to protect property in cyberspace.

Reasoning: Because we use spatial metaphors like 'site' and 'visiting' to describe the internet, we should apply the legal frameworks that govern physical real estate.

Analysis: The argument commits a flaw of equivocation or false analogy by treating a linguistic metaphor as a literal reality. Just because we use spatial language to describe the internet does not mean the internet functions like physical land. Look for an answer choice that criticizes the author for relying on figurative language or metaphors to justify a legal conclusion, as the properties of a 'website' are fundamentally different from those of physical property.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

9.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

Correct Answer
D
It flags that the analogy rests on words rather than on legally relevant similarities. The argument offers only verbal parallels (“site,” “visiting”) and never shows that cyberspace property actually shares the operative characteristics of real estate that justify applying trespass law.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep