Passage Summary: CEOs make a ton more money than their employees, but they don't actually work that much harder, so they don't deserve the extra cash.

Conclusion: The high pay of CEOs is completely unjustified.

Reasoning: CEOs are paid significantly more than average workers, yet they do not work significantly harder than those workers.

Analysis: The activist is operating on a specific moral assumption: that pay should be directly proportional to how hard someone works. To justify this conclusion, we need a principle that bridges the gap between 'effort' and 'justified pay.' Look for a rule that states something like 'A difference in pay is only justified if there is a proportional difference in the amount of work performed.' Without this link, the fact that they don't work harder doesn't necessarily mean the pay is 'unjustified' in a broader economic sense.