Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Warner thinks swimmers stay in the sport longer because they are fitter. Young argues it's actually because they can finally get paid to swim, so they don't have to retire to get a 'real' job.

Conclusion: Warner: Better training regimens are the reason swimmers compete longer. Young: Not necessarily (it is actually due to financial viability).

Reasoning: Warner points to the shift from student swimmers to older competitors as evidence of better fitness. Young points out that swimmers can now make a living from the sport, whereas in the past they had to quit to find outside work.

Analysis: Young's method is to provide an alternative explanation for the phenomenon Warner observed. While Warner attributes the increased longevity of swimmers to physical factors (training), Young attributes it to economic factors (professionalization). This is a classic 'alternative cause' structure. Young doesn't necessarily deny that swimmers are fitter; rather, Young suggests that the primary driver for the change is the ability to earn a living, which removes the previous requirement to retire early.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

4.

Young responds to Warner's argument by

Correct Answer
E
E is exactly what Young does—he offers a plausible alternative explanation (financial support enabling continued competition) for the same phenomenon Warner explains by improved training.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep