Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Good short story writers usually aren't great novelists because the two crafts require opposite skill sets that rarely overlap in one person.

Conclusion: It is rare for excellent short story writers to also be great novelists.

Reasoning: The two forms of writing require different, almost conflicting skills, and it is rare for one person to possess both.

Analysis: The structure is: Group A is unlikely to be successful in Category B because A requires Skill X, B requires Skill Y, and Skill X is actually detrimental to B. Finally, it notes that having both X and Y is rare. To parallel this, look for an answer that follows this 'conflicting requirements' structure: doing one thing well involves a trait that hinders the other, and having both traits is uncommon. The logic relies on a mutual exclusivity between the specific demands of two related but distinct fields.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

23.

The reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to the reasoning above?

Correct Answer
E
E matches the structure: excellence in one sport requires specialized talents that are different from those needed for another, and it’s rare to possess both sets, so excelling in one makes excelling in the other unlikely.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep