Parallel ReasoningDiff: Hard
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: TV writers could make their shows better, but they'd lose viewers. Since they want as many viewers as possible, they won't make the shows better.
Conclusion: The characters on the show will not be made more realistic.
Reasoning: Making characters realistic would reduce the audience size, and the writers prioritize having the largest audience possible.
Analysis: The logic here is a straightforward application of a priority. We have two mutually exclusive options: realistic characters or a maximum audience. The author states the writers will choose the latter, which necessitates rejecting the former. When looking for a parallel, find a scenario where an agent has two conflicting goals, picks one, and therefore must abandon the other. The structure is: X leads to Not Y; Agent wants Y; therefore, Agent will not do X.
Conclusion: The characters on the show will not be made more realistic.
Reasoning: Making characters realistic would reduce the audience size, and the writers prioritize having the largest audience possible.
Analysis: The logic here is a straightforward application of a priority. We have two mutually exclusive options: realistic characters or a maximum audience. The author states the writers will choose the latter, which necessitates rejecting the former. When looking for a parallel, find a scenario where an agent has two conflicting goals, picks one, and therefore must abandon the other. The structure is: X leads to Not Y; Agent wants Y; therefore, Agent will not do X.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage22.Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its reasoning to the argument above?
Correct Answer
D
D matches the logical form. If executives were responsible (R), then the company’s losses would have been greater than competitors (G). But the losses were less than competitors (¬G). Therefore, the executives were not responsible (¬R). This aligns with concluding the negation of the antecedent by using a conditional and a fact about the (negated) consequent, just as the original argument does via contrapositive.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal