Passage Summary: If a hit show is truly new and different, the critics will love it. But critics don't love every hit show, so some of those hits must not be that new or different.

Conclusion: Not all popular television shows are innovative or groundbreaking.

Reasoning: If a popular show is groundbreaking, it is guaranteed to be critically acclaimed; however, because some popular shows lack critical acclaim, they must also lack that groundbreaking quality.

Analysis: This argument uses a valid conditional structure: (A + B) → C. It then observes that some A are not C, which allows it to conclude that those specific A are not B. To find a parallel, look for an argument that establishes a necessary result for a specific subset of a group, identifies members of that group that lack the result, and concludes they must lack the specific characteristic. Don't get distracted by the topic of TV; focus strictly on this 'subset-logic' structure.