Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A fair legal system shouldn't let criminals get ahead by breaking the rules, so we must make sure punishments take away any profit they made from their crimes.

Conclusion: Criminal punishment should be designed to ensure that breaking the law is not a profitable endeavor.

Reasoning: A legal system can only be considered just if it prevents lawbreakers from gaining an unfair advantage over those who follow the law.

Analysis: The statement in question is the foundational premise of the argument. It establishes a general principle about what makes a legal system 'just,' which the jurist then applies to reach a specific conclusion about the goal of punishment. In 'Role in Argument' questions, look for how a statement provides the 'why' for the conclusion. Here, the need for fairness is the logical engine driving the recommendation for profitless crime.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

19.

The jurist's claim that it is important to guarantee that lawbreaking does not give lawbreakers an unfair advantage over law abiders functions in the argument in which one of the following ways?

Correct Answer
B
The statement about guaranteeing no unfair advantage is a principle-premise that supports the conclusion that punishment should aim to make wrongdoing profitless.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep