Flawed ReasoningDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Old people vote a lot and young people don't, so the author concludes that younger generations are just less interested in politics than their parents were.

Conclusion: Each successive generation of citizens is becoming more alienated from the political system.

Reasoning: Current voting data shows that the oldest citizens vote at the highest rates while the youngest citizens vote at the lowest rates.

Analysis: The argument makes a classic error by confusing a 'snapshot' of different age groups with a permanent generational trend. It assumes that because young people aren't voting *now*, they will continue to be disconnected as they age, ignoring the possibility that people simply become more politically active as they grow older. To find the flaw, look for an answer that points out the author fails to consider that the voting behavior might be tied to a person's current age rather than which generation they belong to. It's a bit like assuming a toddler will never walk just because they are currently crawling.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

20.

The argument's reasoning is questionable in that the argument

Correct Answer
A
The argument infers a generational trend from a cross-sectional age comparison, effectively comparing young people of one generation to older people of another generation.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep