Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Scientists checked 1,000 peanuts from two different batches and found way more moldy ones in the second batch, so they concluded the second batch is generally more infected.

Conclusion: Aspergillus infection is more prevalent in lot B than in lot A.

Reasoning: A sample of 1,000 items from each lot showed a significantly higher number of infected items in lot B than in lot A.

Analysis: The argument uses a representative sample to make a generalization about a larger population. It assumes that because the sample sizes are equal and the results differ, the overall groups must differ in the same way. When looking for a parallel, prioritize an answer that takes two equal-sized samples, finds a difference in a specific trait, and concludes that the trait is more common in one of the larger groups. Avoid choices that use different sample sizes or conclude something other than a general frequency.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

9.

The reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to the reasoning in the argument above?

Correct Answer
D
D mirrors the structure: equal-sized groups (1,500 Liberals vs 1,500 Conservatives), more favorable responses among one group (400 vs 300), so the conclusion is that support is more widespread in that group. Same proportional comparison from equal samples to a general prevalence claim.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep