Flawed ReasoningDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: People usually feel better talking to strangers who look like they're the same age. Since most long friendships start by talking to a stranger, your old friends are probably your age.

Conclusion: Long-term friends are likely to be around the same age as one another.

Reasoning: People are generally more comfortable approaching strangers of a similar age, and most long-term friendships begin with such an approach.

Analysis: The argument suffers from a classic confusion between what makes an initial interaction likely and what characterizes the resulting group. Just because you are more likely to approach a peer doesn't mean that the subset of people who actually become long-term friends must be peers. It's a bit like saying you're more likely to buy a snack when you're hungry, so all the food in your pantry must have been bought while you were starving—it ignores the many other ways food (or friends) might be acquired.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

24.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that it

Correct Answer
E
Correct. The argument never considers whether people are also likely to feel comfortable approaching strangers who are not approximately the same age, which is the key gap behind inferring same‑age from comfortable approach.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep