Passage Summary: The author thinks architecture awards should be like the Oscars for 'Best Picture' rather than the Nobels, because buildings are made by teams, not just one person.

Conclusion: The most prestigious architecture award should be given to the best building rather than to an individual architect.

Reasoning: Buildings are the result of collaborative teamwork, making them more similar to movies (which win 'best picture' awards) than to individual scientific discoveries.

Analysis: The argument relies on an analogy to shift the reader's perspective. It contrasts the current model (architecture as science) with a proposed model (architecture as film) to argue that the latter better reflects the reality of the profession. To identify the method of reasoning, look for an answer that mentions using a comparison or an analogy between different fields to support a specific recommendation.