Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A chairperson released a report without asking the rest of the commission first, and the author thinks that was a mistake.

Conclusion: The chairperson acted improperly by releasing the Election Commission's report to the public.

Reasoning: The chairperson failed to consult with any other members of the commission before the report was released.

Analysis: This is a Sufficient Assumption question, which means we are looking for a bridge that connects the premise to the conclusion. The argument moves from a factual premise (no consultation) to a moral or procedural judgment (should not have released). To make this logically airtight, we need a rule that says if you don't consult the members, you shouldn't release the report. Look for an answer choice that establishes this strict requirement for consultation.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

The argument's conclusion can be properly inferred if which one of the following is assumed?

Correct Answer
A
A supplies the missing rule: releasing the report would have been permissible only if most other members had first given their consent. Since no one was consulted, most could not have first consented; the necessary condition for permissibility is unmet. Therefore, the release was not permissible/justified, so the chairperson should not have released it.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep