ParadoxDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Early humans needed high-fat foods to grow big brains, and those foods were most common by the water. However, human brains actually evolved while we were living in the woods and plains instead.

Reasoning: The evolution of the modern human brain required high-calorie, fatty diets found most reliably in shore environments, yet this evolution occurred almost entirely in savanna and woodland areas.

Analysis: The conflict here is between a biological requirement (shore-based nutrition) and a geographical reality (savanna/woodland evolution). To resolve this, we need a way to get those 'shore-like' nutrients into the savanna, or a reason why the savanna was actually sufficient. Perhaps certain savanna animals provided the necessary fats, or perhaps the ancestors lived in areas where both environments were accessible. Look for an answer that makes the high-calorie requirement attainable within the savanna or woodland setting.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

18.

Which one of the following, if true, would most help to resolve the apparent conflict presented above?

Correct Answer
E
E explains that gathering food at the shore required significantly greater caloric expenditure than in other environments. This means the net caloric gain inland could have been superior, resolving why evolution occurred in savannas and woodlands despite shore abundance.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep