ParadoxDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Merchants in medieval Spain specifically asked to be paid in Senegalese gold coins, even though other coins existed that contained a higher percentage of gold.

Reasoning: Senegalese gold coins were 92 percent pure and easily identifiable by that specific content, whereas other coins could be much purer but required refining.

Analysis: The paradox here is why a merchant would prefer a coin with 92 percent purity over one that is 'much purer.' In a world without modern banking, the ability to verify value is often more important than the theoretical value itself. The stimulus notes that Senegalese coins 'can be recognized because they have that gold content,' suggesting a level of predictability. Look for an answer that explains how the ease of identifying these specific coins outweighed the benefit of the higher gold content found in refined coins, perhaps due to the difficulty of testing purity during a transaction.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

14.

As a preliminary to negotiating prices, merchants selling goods often specified that payment should be in the coins minted from Senegalese gold. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain this preference?

Correct Answer
A
If refined-gold coins varied significantly in purity, then quoting a price in such coins wouldn’t fix how much gold the merchant would actually receive. Requiring Senegalese 92% coins ensures a known, consistent gold quantity per coin, which explains the preference.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep