Role in ArgumentDiff: Hard
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: If you want to know why a culture does something, you have to look at many different groups to make sure your theory isn't just a coincidence.
Conclusion: Social scientists require data from multiple different societies to accurately explain the causes of cultural phenomena.
Reasoning: Without comparative data, one cannot determine if a specific factor is truly necessary or sufficient for a cultural outcome, as seen in the example of political structures and climate.
Analysis: The first sentence is the main conclusion, and the rest of the passage provides a specific example to illustrate why that conclusion is true. The phrase 'for example' is a clear indicator that the second half of the stimulus is serving as evidence for the initial claim. In 'Role in Argument' questions, we must focus strictly on this structural relationship. The claim in question is the broad principle that the rest of the text aims to justify.
Conclusion: Social scientists require data from multiple different societies to accurately explain the causes of cultural phenomena.
Reasoning: Without comparative data, one cannot determine if a specific factor is truly necessary or sufficient for a cultural outcome, as seen in the example of political structures and climate.
Analysis: The first sentence is the main conclusion, and the rest of the passage provides a specific example to illustrate why that conclusion is true. The phrase 'for example' is a clear indicator that the second half of the stimulus is serving as evidence for the initial claim. In 'Role in Argument' questions, we must focus strictly on this structural relationship. The claim in question is the broad principle that the rest of the text aims to justify.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage21.The claim that to explain the causes of cultural phenomena, a social scientist needs data about several societies plays which one of the following roles in the philosopher's reasoning?
Correct Answer
E
E is correct because the initial claim (“to explain causes… needs data about several societies”) is the point the philosopher then justifies by appealing to the requirements for establishing an “only by” causal relationship (ruling out both types of cross-societal counterexamples).
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal