Passage Summary: Copyright was made to help authors get paid so they'd share their work, but sometimes the rules actually stop ideas from getting out there.

Conclusion: Copyright law occasionally fails to meet its original goal of encouraging the spread of ideas and providing fair rewards.

Reasoning: The system was designed as a temporary incentive, but certain modern applications or outcomes now work against that original intent.

Analysis: This 'Complete the Argument' task requires us to find a scenario where the current state of copyright contradicts its 'sole purpose.' Since that purpose is to 'encourage the circulation of ideas,' we should look for an answer choice that describes copyright being used to suppress or limit that circulation. The argument sets up a contrast with 'However,' so the missing piece must be a negative consequence of the law. It is a classic case of a well-intentioned policy having unintended, counterproductive side effects.