ParadoxDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Acid rain takes calcium out of the dirt. Even though three types of trees need that calcium, the sugar maples are struggling way more than the others.

Reasoning: Acid rain depletes soil calcium, a nutrient required by spruce, fir, and sugar maple trees, yet sugar maples exhibit significantly higher rates of calcium-deficiency symptoms than the other two species.

Analysis: The paradox here is a 'difference in effect' despite a 'similarity in needs.' We are looking for an answer that explains why sugar maples are uniquely sensitive to the loss of calcium compared to spruces and firs. Perhaps maples have a higher biological demand for calcium, or perhaps the other trees have deeper root systems that access calcium stores unaffected by acid rain.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

1.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the greater decline among sugar maples?

Correct Answer
C
If spruces and firs can extract calcium from a common soil mineral that acid rain does not affect, they can still meet their calcium needs when acid rain reduces other calcium sources. Sugar maples, lacking that ability, would become calcium-deficient and show greater decline. This cleanly resolves why sugar maples fare worse despite all three species needing calcium.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep