Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A researcher notes that as many people die from medical errors or hospital issues as from everything else put together. They conclude that if we fixed medicine, only half as many people would die each year.

Conclusion: Eliminating deaths caused by medical treatment would result in a fifty percent reduction in the total number of annual deaths.

Reasoning: Currently, the number of people who die from medical treatments or hospitalization is approximately equal to the number of people who die from all other causes combined.

Analysis: This argument fails to account for the inevitability of death. It assumes that if you prevent someone from dying of a medical error today, they won't simply die of their original underlying illness or another cause shortly thereafter. In logic terms, the researcher treats 'cause of death' as if preventing one cause removes the person from the mortality pool entirely. Look for an answer that points out that those saved from iatrogenic disease might still die from other causes within the same year.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

15.

The reasoning in the researcher's argument is flawed because the argument fails to consider that

Correct Answer
C
It directly identifies the key omission: some who don’t die from one cause will die soon from another, undermining the assumption that eliminating iatrogenic deaths reduces the annual total by the full amount.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep