Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A journalist found a list of some members of a secret group. Since a specific company isn't on that list, the journalist assumes the company isn't in the group at all.

Conclusion: Bruch Industries is definitely not a member of the manufacturers' trade group.

Reasoning: A document listing hundreds of manufacturing companies was confirmed to contain only members, and Bruch Industries does not appear on that document.

Analysis: The journalist is making a classic 'absence of evidence' error by assuming the document they received is an exhaustive list of every single member. While the representative confirmed that everyone on the list is a member, they never said that everyone who is a member is on the list. In logical terms, the journalist is treating a sufficient condition for membership as a necessary one. Look for an answer that points out the possibility that the list is merely a partial directory rather than a complete roster.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

4.

The journalist's reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the journalist

Correct Answer
B
The reasoning presumes the document is a complete list of members. Without evidence that it names every member, absence of Bruch on the list does not show it isn’t a member.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep