Passage Summary: Peter thinks modern kids' stories have ditched the bad guys, but Yoko argues the bad guys are still there—they just aren't as frightening as they used to be.

Reasoning: Peter claims modern stories lack immoral characters; Yoko claims they still have them but they've changed in nature.

Analysis: To find the point at issue, we apply the 'Agree/Disagree' test to the speakers' claims. Peter explicitly states that most children's stories nowadays 'don't have clearly immoral characters,' while Yoko counters that they 'still tend to have' them. This is a direct contradiction regarding a matter of fact. While they also discuss the effects of these characters (teaching lessons vs. frightening children), their primary disagreement is whether the characters exist in modern stories at all. Look for an answer that highlights this conflict over the presence of immoral figures.