ParadoxDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A study found that the kids who spent the most time hitting the books got worse grades than those who didn't, yet the researchers still insist that studying is the key to success.

Reasoning: Researchers maintained that studying improves grades despite data showing that the students who studied the most actually received lower grades than those who studied less.

Analysis: This scenario presents a classic correlation-versus-causation problem. To explain why the researchers still believe their hypothesis, we need a factor that accounts for why the high-study group was struggling. Perhaps the students who studied the most were those who found the material most difficult and would have failed entirely without that extra effort. Look for an answer that addresses the baseline academic ability of the students involved.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

14.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the researchers drew the conclusion described above?

Correct Answer
C
C explains the researchers’ conclusion: within each course, more studying correlated with better grades. That supports the hypothesis even if, across all courses combined, the heaviest studiers appear to underperform many lighter studiers due to course difficulty differences.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep