Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Some experts think certain dinosaurs were long-term parents because of their nest fossils, but since crocodiles build the same nests and are quick to leave their young, the nest evidence is shaky.

Conclusion: The discovery of fossilized nests does not conclusively prove that those dinosaur species guarded their young for an extended period.

Reasoning: While some scientists use nests as evidence for long-term care, modern crocodiles build similar nests but only provide care for a very short time.

Analysis: The argument uses a comparative approach to undermine a specific piece of evidence. By showing that a similar physical trait (the nest) exists in a species that does not exhibit the behavior in question (long-term guarding), the author creates a gap in the paleontologists' logic. Look for an answer that completes the thought by pointing out that the evidence is insufficient to support the original theory.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

13.

Which one of the following most logically completes the argument?

Correct Answer
E
E matches the critic’s move. The crocodile counterexample shows that similar nests can exist without long-term guarding, so nest construction is not strong evidence for extended guarding in hadrosaurs.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep