Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Since hanging out with people who share your beliefs makes life much better, everyone should have the legal freedom to pick their own friends.

Conclusion: The right to choose one's associates should not be restricted.

Reasoning: Associating with like-minded people makes it easier to live an enjoyable life where one's lifestyle choices are accepted.

Analysis: The essayist makes a jump from a 'benefit' (it's easier to be happy) to a 'right' (no one should be denied this freedom). To justify this, we need a principle that connects personal well-being or the pursuit of an enjoyable life to a guaranteed freedom. Look for an answer that states if a choice is essential for a person's happiness or lifestyle acceptance, that choice must be protected as a right.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

23.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the essayist's argument?

Correct Answer
C
It supplies the needed bridge: whenever a freedom could make it less difficult to live an enjoyable life, no one should be denied that freedom. That turns the premises into the stated conclusion about freedom of association.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep