Flawed ReasoningDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A critic says going to Mars is too dangerous, but the author argues that because every individual part of the trip is made safe by backups, the whole trip is safe.

Conclusion: The critic's claim that Mars explorers are unlikely to survive the journey is an exaggeration of the actual risk.

Reasoning: The journey would include backup systems at every stage, and a fatal accident is very unlikely to occur at any single stage when such systems are present.

Analysis: The author commits a classic error by failing to consider the cumulative risk of a multi-stage process. Even if the chance of failure at any one stage is low, those small probabilities add up over a 'long and complicated' journey. Look for an answer that points out how a series of unlikely events can collectively become a likely event. It is the logical equivalent of saying a coin flip is unlikely to land on heads ten times in a row, so the whole sequence is safe.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

8.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the argument

Correct Answer
A
The argument infers something about the whole (overall trip safety) from each part (per-stage safety). That’s the precise flaw: what holds for each part need not hold for the whole, especially with accumulating risks.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep