Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: This guy thinks he can't buy a single painting from a famous collection just because the whole collection is worth a fortune.

Conclusion: MacNeil cannot afford any individual piece of art from the Vidmar collection.

Reasoning: The Vidmar collection as a whole is one of the most valuable privately owned art collections ever assembled.

Analysis: This is a textbook 'Fallacy of Division,' where someone assumes that what is true of a whole group must also be true of every individual part. Just because a collection is worth millions doesn't mean there isn't a single affordable sketch or minor work within it. To find the parallel, look for an argument that takes a general characteristic of a group (like being expensive, heavy, or fast) and incorrectly applies it to every single member of that group.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

7.

The flawed pattern of reasoning in which one of the following is most closely parallel to that in MacNeil's argument?

Correct Answer
C
“This paragraph is long. So the sentences that comprise it are long.” This mirrors the whole-to-part mistake: inferring each part shares the whole’s property.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep