Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Because the highly educated priests were good at math, we can assume every regular person in the Mayan empire was also a math whiz.

Conclusion: The general Mayan population had a strong grasp of sophisticated mathematical concepts.

Reasoning: The writings of Mayan religious scribes demonstrate a high degree of mathematical competence.

Analysis: This argument suffers from a sampling flaw, specifically a part-to-whole error. It assumes that because a specialized, elite group (the scribes) possessed a skill, that skill was common among the entire population. It's like assuming everyone in a city is a professional athlete just because the local basketball team is in the playoffs. Look for an answer that points out the scribes are likely not representative of the average Mayan citizen.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

8.

The argument's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

Correct Answer
B
The reasoning generalizes about the entire population’s mathematical grasp from the writings of religious scribes, a group likely not representative of the general populace. That’s an unrepresentative sample.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep