Passage Summary: A manager argues that teaching employees to be creative is a waste of time because most jobs don't need it and we don't even know if it's possible to teach it.

Conclusion: Promoting creativity should not be considered a valid goal for employee training programs.

Reasoning: Many jobs do not require creativity and could be disrupted by it, and there is no evidence that creativity is a skill that can actually be taught.

Analysis: The first sentence is the main claim, while the rest of the passage provides reasons why that claim is true. To identify the conclusion here, look for the statement that the other sentences are working to support. Notice the phrase 'no good reason to suppose,' which signals the author's stance on the issue. In this structure, the manager presents a thesis and then backs it up with two distinct premises regarding job requirements and teachability.