Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A challenger says the mayor's job growth is misleading because it just came from people moving into town for a specific office. The mayor ignores that point and just says, 'Hey, the numbers are high, and my opponent didn't say the numbers were wrong!'

Conclusion: The mayor's job growth record is superior to her predecessors and she has fulfilled her promise.

Reasoning: The opponent does not dispute the 8 percent job growth statistic, and this percentage is higher than that achieved by any previous mayor.

Analysis: The mayor is employing a classic 'red herring' by focusing on the accuracy of the statistics rather than the substance of the challenger's critique. The challenger isn't saying the jobs don't exist; they are saying the jobs didn't help the local citizens the mayor promised to support. The mayor's response is a bit like a student bragging about a high grade on a group project where they didn't actually do any of the work. Look for an answer that identifies the mayor's failure to address the specific explanation provided by the challenger.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

As a response to the challenger, the mayor's answer is flawed in that it

Correct Answer
C
The mayor never addresses the challenger’s point that the 8 percent increase may not have translated into more opportunities for existing residents, since the new jobs were occupied by newcomers. That is the specific flaw in her response.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep