Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Elena says democracy is best because it makes people feel involved; Marsha counters by saying that feeling can be faked by any government.

Conclusion: Implicitly, Elena's definition of the 'best' government is flawed or incomplete.

Reasoning: Governments have the capacity to trick their citizens into feeling influential even when those citizens have no actual power.

Analysis: Marsha's role here is to challenge the sufficiency of Elena's premise. Elena claims that 'fostering a belief' is the hallmark of a great government, but Marsha points out that this belief can be a product of manipulation rather than actual democratic participation. Marsha is essentially providing a counter-possibility that undermines the link Elena draws between citizen perception and the inherent quality of the government. Focus on how Marsha's statement serves as a rebuttal to Elena's logic.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

6.

Marsha's claim that it is possible for governments to manipulate people into thinking that they have a say when they do not is used to

Correct Answer
C
C is right: Marsha’s point shows that Elena’s premise (fostering the belief that citizens have a say) could also support a conflicting conclusion—namely, that some nondemocracies could be “best” by that standard—so Elena’s reasoning is undermined.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep