Passage Summary: While people should have the legal right to express themselves freely, it is still morally wrong to profit by catering to people's low or offensive tastes.

Reasoning: N/A

Analysis: The principle establishes a distinction between what is legally permissible (freedom of expression) and what is ethically acceptable (avoiding the exploitation of depraved tastes for money). To apply this, we need a scenario where someone is exercising their right to speak or create but is doing so in a way that is 'wrong' because it targets offensive tastes for profit. The correct judgment will likely involve a person or company being criticized for their financial motives, even if their actions are technically legal.