Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A rental agreement says you aren't responsible for damage if you wrote it down when you moved in, or if the damage happened later due to something you couldn't help.

Reasoning: The lease provides two specific conditions under which a tenant is exempt from paying for damage: if the damage was recorded on the preexisting damage list, or if the damage was caused by factors beyond the tenant's control.

Analysis: This is a 'Principle Application' task. We need to find a scenario that triggers one of the two 'get out of jail free' cards mentioned in the lease. To support the view that the tenant doesn't have to pay, the answer choice must clearly show either that the damage was documented before they moved in or that the damage was an 'act of God' or some other external force. If the damage isn't on the list and the tenant caused it (or could have prevented it), they're on the hook for the bill.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

1.

In which one of the following instances does the extract from the lease most strongly support the view that the tenant is not required to pay for the damage?

Correct Answer
B
Unrecorded damage caused by factors beyond the tenant’s control falls under the stated exception, so the tenant is not required to pay.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep