Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A commercial claims its medicine is superior because it has more of the same ingredients than a rival brand, which is safe and supposedly works faster.

Conclusion: Consumers should choose the advertised product over its competitor.

Reasoning: The advertised product has a higher concentration of the same active ingredients as the competitor, this higher concentration is safe, and faster relief is always better.

Analysis: The argument makes a significant leap by assuming that a higher concentration of ingredients automatically results in faster relief. While the commercial establishes that the higher dose is safe, it fails to provide any evidence that the extra medicine actually speeds up the recovery process. Look for an answer that highlights this missing link between the amount of the ingredient and the speed of the effect.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

9.

The television commercial's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

Correct Answer
E
The commercial never establishes that higher concentration yields faster relief; it simply presumes that link. Without that, the premise “if faster, then preferable” cannot justify choosing the advertised product.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep