Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Two people are debating how to regulate pollution; one wants to use long-term averages, while the other argues that averages are misleading—like calculating a car's speed by including the time it spends stopped at red lights.

Reasoning: Levin uses an analogy of speed limits to argue that measuring average emissions is dangerous because it ignores harmful short-term peaks.

Analysis: In Levin's analogy, the 'peak speed' represents the dangerous high-emission periods he wants to regulate. The 'average speed' represents the regulatory method Shaw is proposing. Therefore, the time a vehicle spends at a 'stoplight' represents a period of low or zero activity that artificially lowers the average. Look for an answer that describes a power plant operating at low capacity or being temporarily shut down, as this is what would 'dilute' the average emission levels in the same way a red light dilutes average driving speed.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

Based on the analogy in Levin's argument, time that a vehicle spends at a stoplight is analogous to time that a power plant

Correct Answer
D
At a stoplight, a vehicle’s speed is zero. In Levin’s analogy, that maps to times when the plant’s emission rate is zero—i.e., it emits no pollutants at all.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep