Principle JustifyDiff: Hardest
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: The rule is that you don't have to go to a meeting if nothing on the agenda applies to you; therefore, Terry is excused from today's 2:00 PM meeting.
Conclusion: Terry should not be required to attend the meeting scheduled for two o'clock today.
Reasoning: The principle states that attendance should not be required if none of the issues at a meeting are relevant to the person in question.
Analysis: This is a 'Principle Justify' question, which functions like a 'Sufficient Assumption' task. We have a general rule (If no issues are relevant -> No attendance required) and a specific conclusion (Terry -> No attendance required). To make this argument logically sound, we must bridge the gap by establishing that the condition of the rule has been met. Look for an answer that explicitly states that none of the issues at today's 2:00 PM meeting are relevant to Terry.
Conclusion: Terry should not be required to attend the meeting scheduled for two o'clock today.
Reasoning: The principle states that attendance should not be required if none of the issues at a meeting are relevant to the person in question.
Analysis: This is a 'Principle Justify' question, which functions like a 'Sufficient Assumption' task. We have a general rule (If no issues are relevant -> No attendance required) and a specific conclusion (Terry -> No attendance required). To make this argument logically sound, we must bridge the gap by establishing that the condition of the rule has been met. Look for an answer that explicitly states that none of the issues at today's 2:00 PM meeting are relevant to Terry.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage25.Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the stated application of the principle?
Correct Answer
C
By stating that no issue relevant to Terry could be relevant to a majority of those attending, it ensures Terry’s issues cannot be on the agenda (since only majority-relevant issues are addressed). Therefore, none of the addressed issues are relevant to Terry, and the principle’s second clause justifies that Terry should not be required to attend.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal