Passage Summary: It isn't the change in the environment that kills off species; it's how fast that change occurs.

Conclusion: The danger to woodland species is caused by the speed of tree removal rather than the act of cutting down trees itself.

Reasoning: Species can handle environmental changes as long as those changes do not happen too quickly.

Analysis: The argument distinguishes between a specific action and the rate of that action, identifying the latter as the true cause of a negative outcome. To parallel this, look for an answer that follows a similar 'It’s not X itself, but the speed/rate of X that matters' structure. The logic relies on a conditional premise (survival is possible if the rate is slow) to draw a conclusion about a specific instance of that phenomenon.