Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: We've passed many green laws, but things are still going downhill. Therefore, passing more laws won't help.

Conclusion: Additional environmental regulations are not the correct solution for environmental issues.

Reasoning: Extensive regulations have been passed since the 1970s, yet the environment is still getting worse according to environmentalists.

Analysis: The flaw here is a failure to consider the 'counterfactual'—what would have happened without the regulations. Just because the environment is worsening doesn't mean the regulations are failing; they might be preventing a total catastrophe. The argument treats the lack of a total cure as proof that the medicine is useless. Look for an answer that points out the argument ignores the possibility that regulations have actually slowed the rate of deterioration.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

2.

The argument's reasoning is flawed because the argument

Correct Answer
C
It pinpoints the missed counterfactual: the environment might have deteriorated even more without regulations. That shows the observed worsening does not establish that more regulations aren’t part of the solution.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep